NEW MSOE MUSEUM HAS ROOFTOP SCULPTURE GARDEN

featured on Christiansen Roofing Co., Inc.'s website: www.christiansenroofing.com

Development of the Grohmann Museum at the Milwaukee School of Engineering involved one of the most interesting building renovations in the city in recent years. It also involved installation of one of the most interesting roofs in the city.

The museum, at 1000 N. Broadway downtown, was developed within an 83-year-old structure that most recently served as a check clearing facility for the Federal Reserve Board. Under that use, the building had narrow windows and no public access. As a museum, it has been opened up to more natural light and to the public, thanks to the work of Uihlein-Wilson Architects and The Bentley Co. as general contractor.

The 38,000-square-foot structure was originally built in 1924 to house Metropolitan Cadillac, then owned by Glenn Humphrey, whose last name is familiar to many Milwaukeeans not only from his Cadillac and Chevrolet dealerships but also through his extensive philanthropy in the community.

The building had been unoccupied since 2004 when the Federal Reserve moved its Milwaukee operations to Chicago. That all changed when Eckhart Grohmann, chairman and president of Milwaukee's Aluminum Casting & Engineering Co., donated funds to acquire and redevelop the1000 N. Broadway building to house the extensive art collection he donated to MSOE in 2001. Grohmann also is an MSOE regent and longtime supporter.

Whether you are driving or walking by the corner of Broadway and State Street, you can't help but notice the museum's striking corner steel and glass cylindrical atrium and its rooftop sculptures.

But those dramatic rooftop sculptures you see from street level are only part of a unique rooftop sculpture garden created with the design/build help of F.J.A. Christiansen Roofing. The dozen roofline sculptures are each about nine feet tall and weigh 1,000 pounds apiece. Cast in bronze, they are replicas of smaller originals within the museum's collection. Another six sculptures are strategically situated about the 10,000-square-foot rooftop garden, which was created for both relaxation and entertaining.

Several situations made it an interesting roofing project, noted Greg Johnson, F.J.A. Christiansen's operations manager involved with the work. “It's a green roof, but one that has sod rather than the usual green roof plants,” Johnson stated. The statues amid the garden required unusual roof membrane placement. And perhaps most interesting, the tapered roofing system includes an Electric Field Vector Mapping (EFVM) layer – a high-tech way to check for leaks.

The EFVM layer is basically a thin foil-faced sheet that is placed between the insulation and the roof membrane, and grounded to the roof drains. When it's activated, the EFVM creates a low-voltage circuitry that can be monitored. If water were to leak through a hole in the membrane, even as small as a pinhole, the voltage would vary in that area, and the breach could be easily located.

When the EFVM system on the Grohmann Museum was tested, no breaches were found. The membrane was then intentionally cut to allow water to pass through to ensure the system was functioning. The person operating the EFVM monitor was not told where the cut was made. Within five minutes the leak location was identified, showing that the EFVM system was operable. (The membrane breach was then sealed.)

The EFVM layer remains in place for the life of the roof, allowing testing at any time or, should a leak be noticed, quick identification of the probable leak source. That means any repair work would be less disruptive and completed more quickly.

The Grohmann Museum roof membrane system utilizes a durable an 80-mil, PVC waterproof Sika/Sarnafil product, well matched to the waterproofing needs below this green roof plaza.

“The garden statues presented one of several unique project challenges,” Johnson noted. Before the statue bases were poured, a membrane had to be installed and flashing applied. After the bases were in place, the roof's insulation layer was put down over the concrete deck, followed by the EFVM sheet and the overall membrane, which was then sealed to the statue-base membrane.

But visitors to the roof won't see many hints of roofing materials. They will encounter a garden setting that includes walking pavers fanned out from the corner dome, large concrete pots with various plants, sod and the statues.

“It's a fully functional roof from a building envelope standpoint that also looks like a very nice garden,” Johnson said. Because sod was used rather than customary green roof plants such as sedum and chives, an irrigation system was installed to make sure the grass gets sufficient water.

FJAC also installed copings on the roof's perimeter.

The work was all done under a very tight schedule. The schedule included an October open house for the museum. To accommodate the open house, some temporary materials had to be put in place.

The museum is another cultural asset for downtown Milwaukee and another indicator of the broad value MSOE adds to the city. The museum's collection, officially known as the Eckhart G. Grohmann Collection “Man at Work,” comprises 700 paintings and sculptures dating back to 1580. Various pieces from that collection will be exhibited in the three floors of galleries and in special themed exhibitions, including the current one through April 14: Physicians, Quacks and Alchemists.

The museum is billed as home to the world's most comprehensive art collection dedicated to the evolution of human work.

The Grohmann Museum presently is open 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Mondays-Fridays, noon-6 p.m. Saturdays and 1-4 p.m. Sundays. Admission is $5 general, $3 students 11-18 years old and adults 65 or older, and free to MSOE students with ID or children 10 or younger.

WATERPROOFING DESIGN OPTIONS FOR GREEN ROOFS

by Gary W. Whittemore, CDT

www.us.sika.com

With the increased desire for high-performance buildings and sustainable building products, green roofs have become a ‘growing’ roofing option in North America. Also known as a garden roof, vegetated roof, or eco-roof, these assemblies are simply a planted area on a flat or sloped roof. While conventional rooftop gardens usually consist of a few pots and planters, a green roof system can cover the whole roof area with the cultivation of plant life.

In Europe, extensive research and testing on how to waterproof green roofs started in the early 1970s. This work resulted in today’s waterproofing solutions, allowing durable and sustainable green roofs to grow in popularity. Although each green roof is unique and designed to meet multiple design and performance criteria, all green roofs contain the same basic components. The challenge for specifiers and designers is to determine which components are necessary and where they are should be located within the green roof assembly.

A budding green roof market
In early 2006, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities (GRHC) embarked on the first industry-wide survey to develop data on the size, composition, and geographic distribution of the green roof industry in North America and the United States.1 A partial summary of the findings are found in Figure 1 (page XX).

The survey indicates that in 2005, nearly 230,000 m2 (2.5 million sf) of green roofs were planted in North America. This is an increase of 86 percent compared to 2004. Approximately 87 percent of the green roofs planted in North America in 2005 were located in the United States. The leading areas were Chicago, metro Washington D.C., and New York City.

The numbers are said to be understated since several GRHC corporate members were not able to collect and report the data. GRHC members believe such dramatic growth is sustainable as policies are implemented across North America to encourage green roof construction. GRHC is in the process of collecting data for the 2006 market and expects to release this information in early 2007.

It’s the ‘look’ that counts
The first question that needs to be answered is what the client wants the green roof to look like. Although this is a simple question, there are several factors that impact the final plant selection.2

Client-dependent factors
1. Capital and maintenance budgets in regard to the cost of plants, which includes shipping, installation method, species, and care. Mats, trays, and plugs provide immediate results, but are more expensive than cuttings and seeds.
2. Aesthetic desires, meaning the color, style, and seasonality of the vegetation.
3. Functionality, which refers to the intent of the green roof to reduce stormwater, noise, or energy consumption. Additionally, design professionals must consider whether the area be accessible to pedestrians

Climate- and weather-related factors
1. Macro-climatic zones—maps of low- and high-temperature hardiness zones based on 25 to 30 year averages are available from the U.S. National Arboretum (USNA).3
2. Micro-climatic zones—climates outside the normal zone affected by mountains, valleys, seacoasts, urban centers, structures, and surrounding buildings. Additionally, the amount and direction of sunlight, seasonal temperature, rainfall, wind, humidity, and soil type create unique rooftop micro-environments.

Structure-dependent factors
1. Composition and depth of growing medium.
2. Slope of roof.
3. Transmission of heat through steel, wood, HVAC vents, etc.
4. Areas of shade, partial shade, full sun, wind flow, building height, parapet walls.

Plant-dependent factors
1. Growth rate.
2. Sensitivity to airborne pollutants.
3. Ability to withstand wind.
4. Sensitivity to light.
5. Tolerance to drought.
6. Fire resistance.

Supply and scheduling
1. Availability of required plants.
2. Planting methods.
3. Timing of installation.

Once the plant selection is established, the green roof design process can begin.

Plants determine the growing medium depth
The growing medium depth necessary to sustain plant growth depends on the plant species and maintenance practices. Figure 2 is a rule-of-thumb guideline for general species and green roof type.4

The terms ‘extensive’ and ‘intensive’ green roofs were adopted from the German FFL Green Roof Guidelines. While there can be some variations in definition, the main distinction between the two types is the depth of the growing medium and the maintenance required to sustain the system.

Extensive green roof systems
Extensive green roofs use a narrower range of species limited to herbs, grasses, mosses, and drought-tolerant succulents such as Sedum, a plant known for its tolerance for extreme conditions. These types of plants can potentially be sustained without automatic irrigation in a growing medium layer as shallow as 25.4 mm (1 in.). Therefore, they can often be installed on buildings without the cost of major structural alterations.5 The fully saturated weight of an extensive green roof system ranges from 58.8 to 171.5 kg/m2 (12 to 35 lb/sf).6

Extensive green roofs are generally not accessible to the public and have lower input requirements for resources. They require less maintenance and are generally less expensive to install. Annual maintenance consists of a general inspection, removal of weeds and unwanted vegetation, and a nutrient check of the growing medium. If a grass-based system is used, it will require more frequent mowing and nutrient checking.

Intensive green roof systems
Intensive green roofs use a wide variety of plant species that may also include trees and shrubs. Using large plants requires deeper growing medium layers, usually 152 mm (6 in.) or more, which results in additional weight and a need for an increased structural load capacity of the building. The fully saturated weight of an intensive green roof system ranges from 245 to 1470 kg/m2 (50 to 300 lb/sf).7

Intensive green roofs are often accessible to the general public and can create a park-like atmosphere. Higher input requirements for water, labor, and other resources are standard. Regular care and upkeep is required, similar to that of an ornamental garden.8

Typical maintenance for this type of green roof includes:
· weeding and removal of unwanted vegetation;
· cutting and trimming;
· preventative measures to protect plants from pests and diseases;
· fertilization; and
· watering.

Structural substrate influences roof design
The weight of a green roof assembly will influence the decision on selecting a structural substrate. The most common structural substrates are metal decks and structural concrete decks. The substrate selection will directly impact the green roof assembly.

Metal deck and conventional green roof designs
Figure 3 (page XX) illustrates a typical green roof assembly over a metal deck. The most common design approach over a metal deck is to build a ‘conventional’ roof assembly. Typical components starting at the deck are:
· metal deck;
· thermal barrier (if required by code);
· rigid insulation;
· waterproofing membrane;
· drainage composite;
· growing medium; and
· vegetation.

The thermal barrier is rigid, fire-tested hardboard that is mechanically attached to the metal deck. It is moisture-resistant and available in 6-mm (0.25-in.), 13-mm (0.50-in.) and 16-mm (0.625-in.) thicknesses.

The rigid insulation material is typically extruded polystyrene (XPS), which is resistant to moisture absorption and has been used in green roof applications for decades. It is available in 280 kPa (40 psi), 420 kPa, (60 psi), and 700 kPa (100 psi) compressive strengths so it will not crush during construction or under load after placement. Local building codes usually require the installation of a thermal barrier over the metal deck prior to installing the XPS insulation board.

Rigid polyisocyanurate (polyiso) foam insulation is sometimes used in conventional green roof applications. The benefit is it does not require a thermal barrier. However, since polyiso foam is typically manufactured with a 140 to 175 kPa (20 to 25 psi) compressive strength, a rigid hardboard should be installed over the insulation to protect it from damage during the vegetated cover installation. Like XPS, polyiso is mechanically attached to the metal deck and the hardboard is glued to the isocyanurate with a cold-applied adhesive. Adhering the hardboard to the insulation is the preferred method since it eliminates fastener heads and plates under the waterproofing membrane.

The waterproofing membrane is installed over the insulation. It is usually loose-laid, but can be mechanically fastened or adhered if required. Some waterproofing membrane manufacturers require a separation layer (e.g. felt) between the insulation and membrane.

The most common type of waterproofing membrane in the conventional green roof design is a thermoplastic sheet, which is typically formulated from polyvinyl chloride (PVC). PVC sheets have a long track record in green roof applications in Europe and the United States. Both the Swiss and German governments closely regulate waterproofing membranes used in green roof construction. The Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA) 280 standard for concealed roofing (i.e. waterproofing membranes) and German FLL are regarded as the most stringent and meaningful green roof membrane test protocols in the world.9 This author recommends design professionals specify waterproofing membranes that meet both protocols to ensure product suitability. SIA- and FLL-certified membranes can provide an impermeable barrier against aggressive root growth and ponded water. The laps and flashings are hot-air welded, providing permanent seaming.

Other sheet waterproofing membrane options include thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) and ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM)10. TPO is a newcomer to green roof applications but since it is thermoplastic, it offers the security of hot-air welded seams. EPDM has been used in waterproofing applications such as plaza decks for years. These sheets are available in various thicknesses depending on the depth of the green roof and the length of the manufacturer’s warranty. These products may require a root barrier to protect the waterproofing membrane from root growth.

Built-up and modified bitumen roofing systems are used less frequently in green roof applications because of concerns among specifiers of the long-term performance of bitumen in such harsh, buried, living environments.

The drainage composite is placed over the waterproofing membrane. There are several types of drainage composites available. The drainage structures vary from entangled filaments to thermoformed dimpled cups to geonets. Some drainage composites also serve as the protection layer for the waterproofing membrane. A separate protection layer can be specified over the waterproofing membrane and under the drainage composite for added protection and security, especially on projects anticipating a significant amount of construction traffic.

Benefits of conventional roof designs
Conventional roof designs are most common in extensive green roof systems. Since these systems are relatively lightweight, steel decking is typically used as the substrate for the green roof. Although conventional roof designs are common for exposed and ballasted roofs, there are additional specific benefits when used in green roofs.

1. Insulation is protected and dry. Since the insulation is under the membrane, it is not subjected to rain, moisture, plant roots, microorganisms and the like found within the vegetated cover.
2. Insulation does not interfere with water retention systems. Some green roofs are designed to retain water to sustain the vegetated cover. The water is usually retained at the membrane level. If insulation is introduced above this barrier, it will interfere with the water retention system. Additionally, ponding ridges—when incorporated into the system—can be easily secured directly to the waterproofing membrane.
3. Insulation remains in place. If the insulation is placed above the waterproofing membrane, it may become buoyant and float during severe rain events, likely displacing the vegetated cover above.
4. Tapered insulation is an option. The designer has the flexibility to incorporate tapered insulation into the design since it is under the waterproofing membrane and creates slope to facilitate drainage.

Concrete deck and protected membrane design
Because of the heavy loads associated with intensive green roofs, the most common substrate is structural concrete with a ‘protected membrane’ roof assembly. Figure 4 illustrates a typical green roof assembly over a concrete deck. Typical components starting at the deck are:
· structural concrete deck;
· leveling layer (if required by membrane manufacturer);
· waterproofing membrane;
· protection/drainage layer (optional);
· XPS insulation;
· drainage composite;
· growing medium; and
· vegetation

In this design, the waterproofing membrane is installed over the concrete deck and insulation is placed above this barrier. The waterproofing membrane can be adhered or ‘compartmentalized’ in a containment grid configuration to localize water migration under the waterproofing membrane in the event of a leak.

The most common types of waterproofing membranes for the protected membrane assembly are thermoplastic sheets, self-adhering bituminous sheets, and hot liquid-applied rubberized asphalt. Thermoplastic sheets are versatile since they can be adhered directly to the concrete substrate or installed in a containment grid configuration. Self-adhering bituminous sheets and hot liquid-applied rubberized asphalt systems bond directly to the deck.

Adhered system
Adhered systems are most commonly used in new construction projects where a smooth concrete finish can be specified and achieved in the field. Most waterproofing membrane manufacturers require a magnesium float or steel trowel finish. The concrete should be cured for 14 to 28 days and be surface-dry for the membrane application. If used, curing compounds must be compatible with the waterproofing membrane and should not interfere with the bond of the membrane to the concrete substrate. Adhered systems typically have installation temperature limitations since adhesives tend to lose their tack in cold temperatures (i.e. approximately –4 to 4 C [25 to 40 F]), or may become too sticky to work with in high temperatures (i.e. approximately 32 C [90 F]).

Sheet systems can provide factory-controlled uniform thickness throughout the waterproofing membrane. The materials can be adhered with specially formulated, compatible field-applied adhesives. Some membrane manufacturers offer ‘self-adhered’ membranes that incorporate a pressure-sensitive adhesive that is factory-applied onto the waterproofing membrane during manufacture. The pressure-sensitive adhesive is protected by a release liner that is removed during the installation. The concrete substrate is conditioned or primed prior to the membrane installation to bind residual dust that can interfere with the membrane’s adhesion.

Hot liquid-applied rubberized asphalt systems have been used over concrete decks in green roof applications for a number of years. The rubberized asphalt material is shipped as a solid and is heated on-site in a double-jacketed melter between 176 to 190 C (350 to 375 F). It is applied in a two-coat liquid application with a reinforcing fabric placed between each coat. A surface conditioner is sprayed to the concrete deck prior to installing the rubberized asphalt and allowed to dry. The first coat of rubberized asphalt is a minimum 2.3-mm (90 mil) thick. A layer of spun bonded polyester fabric reinforcing sheet is embedded into the first coat, followed by a second layer with an average thickness of 3.2 mm (125 mil). The total membrane thickness is an average of 5.46 mm (215 mil) with a minimum thickness of 4.57 mm (180 mil).11

A root barrier protection course is embedded into the rubberized asphalt while the material is still hot. This layer is required to protect the waterproofing membrane from the aggressive roots of the vegetated cover. It also provides installers with a walking surface.

Containment grid system
The containment grid system is an option with thermoplastic sheets. It combines the performance benefits of the adhered system with the application benefits of a loose-laid system. In this design, the area to be waterproofed is segmented into smaller waterproofed grids. If there is a leak in the system, water cannot migrate from one grid to another, making it easier to locate the source of the leak.

Containment grids are created by bonding 305-mm (12-in.) wide thermoplastic grid strips to the concrete deck by bonding them with a specially formulated adhesive. The grid strips are installed around the deck’s perimeter, around projections, at the base of walls, and at the high points of the sloped areas. The waterproofing membrane is loose-laid over a geotextile fabric and welded to the grid strips. Since the waterproofing membrane is loose-laid between the grids, it can be installed at any temperature, even over damp surfaces. This provides a significant benefit to the construction schedule since it will limit the number of no-work days.

The grid system is frequently used on renovation projects where significant time and money may be spent preparing the entire concrete deck to receive an adhered system. Instead, surface preparation is limited to the areas receiving the grid strips. The geotextile fabric provides a cushioning layer and separates the existing waterproofing system from the new waterproofing membrane.

Insulation
Since the insulation is on top of the waterproofing membrane in a protected membrane roof assembly, XPS should be specified. It is designed for moist, buried environments. Polyiso insulation boards are only intended for ‘conventional’ roof designs.

Drainage and water retention
Prefabricated drainage composites or granular drainage systems are placed over the XPS insulation in protected membrane assemblies. This allows excess water to evacuate the system quickly. In some cases, an additional layer of drainage composite may be installed under the insulation to prevent floatation. As a rule of thumb, the additional layer of drainage is required if the thickness of the growing medium is less than 1.5 times the thickness of the XPS insulation.

Some green roofs are designed to retain as much water as possible to provide a water source for the vegetated cover. Since the waterproofing membrane is at the deck level, a secondary membrane (i.e. PVC thermoplastic sheet) is needed above the insulation to hold water. Water retention can also be achieved by installing specially designed panels that incorporate molded water retention cups and drainage channels.

Waterproofing quality assurance
Waterproofing is the most critical component of a green roof—a leak in the waterproofing system can be catastrophic. There are several options available to ensure a watertight system before the vegetated cover is planted. One option is to hire a monitor to observe the waterproofing and vegetated cover installation. The monitor should be trained in the membrane application and flashing details. A careful eye can detect application deficiencies and membrane breaches.

A flood test is the most common method for testing for watertightness after the waterproofing is installed and prior to the vegetated cover installation. The area is ‘flooded’ with 51 mm (2 in.) of water for 48 hours, after which an inspector checks the inside of the structure for signs of water leakage. If an area is wet, he or she looks for a breach in the waterproofing system, which can be a challenge to detect. Once the breach is found, it is repaired and the area is flood tested again.

Electric field vector mapping (EFVM) is a technique to detect breaches in the waterproofing membrane that are not easily observed by the human eye or are missed during flood tests. This technique is competitive in cost to traditional flood tests. Although it has been used for a number of years in Europe, it is now gaining acceptance in North America. EFVM has several benefits, including:

· locating membrane breaches with pin-point accuracy;
· providing the ability to re-test membrane repairs immediately;
· permanently installed EFVM components facilitate re-testing throughout the lifecycle of the membrane;
· can be used before and after vegetated cover is installed; and
· eliminating unnecessary and costly removal of the vegetated cover.12

It is important to specify compatible protection and/or drainage layers when using EFVM, since some types of protection layers and drainage panels may interfere with the test.

Conclusion
Green roofs are here to stay in North America. At the present time, there are no design standards. Designers are challenged to develop their own green roof designs and specifications with limited information and resources. Waterproofing manufacturers are becoming more involved in the design process to ensure proper selection and placement of green roof components.

In an effort to simplify the design and delivery process, some waterproofing manufacturers have partnered with vegetated cover providers to offer single-source warranties. Such partnerships leverage the expertise and experience of each to deliver technically sound, time-tested, cost-effective green roof solutions. Single-source responsibility drives the parties to become engaged early in the design phase through the installation and beyond. Coordination and cooperation of the waterproofing manufacturer and vegetated cover provider will ensure high-performance, long-lasting green roofs.

Notes
1 See “First Annual Green Roof Industry Survey Shows Significant Growth in North America”. The Green Roof Infrastructure Monitor, Volume 8, No. 1 (Fall 2006).
2 See Green Roofs for Healthy Cities. Green Roof Design 101 Introductory Course, Participant Manual. The Cardinal Group Inc. 2004:67-69.
3 For more on macro- and micro-climatic zones, see the U.S. National Arboretum (USDA) Plant Hardiness Zone Map at www.usna.usda.gov/Hardzone/hrdzon3.html.
4 See C.R. Friedrich’s “Principles for Selecting the Proper Components for a Green Roof Growing Media,” presented at the Third Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference in Washington, DC (May 2005).
5 See Green American Society for Testing Materials. Practice for Assessment of Green Roofs, WK575 Subcommittee E06.71 2002-2-7.
6 Green Roofs for Healthy Cities. Green Roof Infrastructure: Design and Installation – 201, Participant Manual. The Cardinal Group Inc. 2006: 4.
7 See note 6.
8 See note 5.
9 See P.J. D’Antonio’s “Thermoplastic Waterproofing Membranes in Green Roof Construction 2004”, RCI Interface, February 2004.
10 See A.P. Bailey’s “So you want to roof green?”, Professional Roofing, April 2006.
11 See Garden Roof Assembly, Long Form Specification. American Hydrotech, Inc. at www.hydrotechusa.com/specifications/GARDEN_RF Extensive Guidespec.doc. (February 2007).
12 See EFVM Benefits. International Leak Detection at www.leak-detection.com (February 2007).

Additional Information
MasterFormat No.

UniFormat No.

Key words

Abstract
Selecting and locating the various components of a green roof can be challenging. This article focuses on the various waterproofing design options as it relates to the type of green roof and structural deck selected for the project.

Author
Gary W. Whittemore, CDT, has been with Sika Sarnafil Inc. since 2000. He is the product manager for the U.S. waterproofing group based in Sika Sarnafil’s U.S. corporate headquarters in Canton, MA. Prior to this position, he was the national retail and strategic accounts manager for the commercial roofing group. Prior to joining Sika Sarnafil, Whittemore held various waterproofing sales and product management positions during a 20-year career at W. R. Grace & Co. Whittemore holds a B.A. from Columbia University in New York, NY. He can be contacted at whittemore.gary@us.sika.com.