NEW MSOE MUSEUM HAS ROOFTOP SCULPTURE GARDEN

featured on Christiansen Roofing Co., Inc.'s website: www.christiansenroofing.com

Development of the Grohmann Museum at the Milwaukee School of Engineering involved one of the most interesting building renovations in the city in recent years. It also involved installation of one of the most interesting roofs in the city.

The museum, at 1000 N. Broadway downtown, was developed within an 83-year-old structure that most recently served as a check clearing facility for the Federal Reserve Board. Under that use, the building had narrow windows and no public access. As a museum, it has been opened up to more natural light and to the public, thanks to the work of Uihlein-Wilson Architects and The Bentley Co. as general contractor.

The 38,000-square-foot structure was originally built in 1924 to house Metropolitan Cadillac, then owned by Glenn Humphrey, whose last name is familiar to many Milwaukeeans not only from his Cadillac and Chevrolet dealerships but also through his extensive philanthropy in the community.

The building had been unoccupied since 2004 when the Federal Reserve moved its Milwaukee operations to Chicago. That all changed when Eckhart Grohmann, chairman and president of Milwaukee's Aluminum Casting & Engineering Co., donated funds to acquire and redevelop the1000 N. Broadway building to house the extensive art collection he donated to MSOE in 2001. Grohmann also is an MSOE regent and longtime supporter.

Whether you are driving or walking by the corner of Broadway and State Street, you can't help but notice the museum's striking corner steel and glass cylindrical atrium and its rooftop sculptures.

But those dramatic rooftop sculptures you see from street level are only part of a unique rooftop sculpture garden created with the design/build help of F.J.A. Christiansen Roofing. The dozen roofline sculptures are each about nine feet tall and weigh 1,000 pounds apiece. Cast in bronze, they are replicas of smaller originals within the museum's collection. Another six sculptures are strategically situated about the 10,000-square-foot rooftop garden, which was created for both relaxation and entertaining.

Several situations made it an interesting roofing project, noted Greg Johnson, F.J.A. Christiansen's operations manager involved with the work. “It's a green roof, but one that has sod rather than the usual green roof plants,” Johnson stated. The statues amid the garden required unusual roof membrane placement. And perhaps most interesting, the tapered roofing system includes an Electric Field Vector Mapping (EFVM) layer – a high-tech way to check for leaks.

The EFVM layer is basically a thin foil-faced sheet that is placed between the insulation and the roof membrane, and grounded to the roof drains. When it's activated, the EFVM creates a low-voltage circuitry that can be monitored. If water were to leak through a hole in the membrane, even as small as a pinhole, the voltage would vary in that area, and the breach could be easily located.

When the EFVM system on the Grohmann Museum was tested, no breaches were found. The membrane was then intentionally cut to allow water to pass through to ensure the system was functioning. The person operating the EFVM monitor was not told where the cut was made. Within five minutes the leak location was identified, showing that the EFVM system was operable. (The membrane breach was then sealed.)

The EFVM layer remains in place for the life of the roof, allowing testing at any time or, should a leak be noticed, quick identification of the probable leak source. That means any repair work would be less disruptive and completed more quickly.

The Grohmann Museum roof membrane system utilizes a durable an 80-mil, PVC waterproof Sika/Sarnafil product, well matched to the waterproofing needs below this green roof plaza.

“The garden statues presented one of several unique project challenges,” Johnson noted. Before the statue bases were poured, a membrane had to be installed and flashing applied. After the bases were in place, the roof's insulation layer was put down over the concrete deck, followed by the EFVM sheet and the overall membrane, which was then sealed to the statue-base membrane.

But visitors to the roof won't see many hints of roofing materials. They will encounter a garden setting that includes walking pavers fanned out from the corner dome, large concrete pots with various plants, sod and the statues.

“It's a fully functional roof from a building envelope standpoint that also looks like a very nice garden,” Johnson said. Because sod was used rather than customary green roof plants such as sedum and chives, an irrigation system was installed to make sure the grass gets sufficient water.

FJAC also installed copings on the roof's perimeter.

The work was all done under a very tight schedule. The schedule included an October open house for the museum. To accommodate the open house, some temporary materials had to be put in place.

The museum is another cultural asset for downtown Milwaukee and another indicator of the broad value MSOE adds to the city. The museum's collection, officially known as the Eckhart G. Grohmann Collection “Man at Work,” comprises 700 paintings and sculptures dating back to 1580. Various pieces from that collection will be exhibited in the three floors of galleries and in special themed exhibitions, including the current one through April 14: Physicians, Quacks and Alchemists.

The museum is billed as home to the world's most comprehensive art collection dedicated to the evolution of human work.

The Grohmann Museum presently is open 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Mondays-Fridays, noon-6 p.m. Saturdays and 1-4 p.m. Sundays. Admission is $5 general, $3 students 11-18 years old and adults 65 or older, and free to MSOE students with ID or children 10 or younger.

WATERPROOFING DESIGN OPTIONS FOR GREEN ROOFS

by Gary W. Whittemore, CDT

www.us.sika.com

With the increased desire for high-performance buildings and sustainable building products, green roofs have become a ‘growing’ roofing option in North America. Also known as a garden roof, vegetated roof, or eco-roof, these assemblies are simply a planted area on a flat or sloped roof. While conventional rooftop gardens usually consist of a few pots and planters, a green roof system can cover the whole roof area with the cultivation of plant life.

In Europe, extensive research and testing on how to waterproof green roofs started in the early 1970s. This work resulted in today’s waterproofing solutions, allowing durable and sustainable green roofs to grow in popularity. Although each green roof is unique and designed to meet multiple design and performance criteria, all green roofs contain the same basic components. The challenge for specifiers and designers is to determine which components are necessary and where they are should be located within the green roof assembly.

A budding green roof market
In early 2006, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities (GRHC) embarked on the first industry-wide survey to develop data on the size, composition, and geographic distribution of the green roof industry in North America and the United States.1 A partial summary of the findings are found in Figure 1 (page XX).

The survey indicates that in 2005, nearly 230,000 m2 (2.5 million sf) of green roofs were planted in North America. This is an increase of 86 percent compared to 2004. Approximately 87 percent of the green roofs planted in North America in 2005 were located in the United States. The leading areas were Chicago, metro Washington D.C., and New York City.

The numbers are said to be understated since several GRHC corporate members were not able to collect and report the data. GRHC members believe such dramatic growth is sustainable as policies are implemented across North America to encourage green roof construction. GRHC is in the process of collecting data for the 2006 market and expects to release this information in early 2007.

It’s the ‘look’ that counts
The first question that needs to be answered is what the client wants the green roof to look like. Although this is a simple question, there are several factors that impact the final plant selection.2

Client-dependent factors
1. Capital and maintenance budgets in regard to the cost of plants, which includes shipping, installation method, species, and care. Mats, trays, and plugs provide immediate results, but are more expensive than cuttings and seeds.
2. Aesthetic desires, meaning the color, style, and seasonality of the vegetation.
3. Functionality, which refers to the intent of the green roof to reduce stormwater, noise, or energy consumption. Additionally, design professionals must consider whether the area be accessible to pedestrians

Climate- and weather-related factors
1. Macro-climatic zones—maps of low- and high-temperature hardiness zones based on 25 to 30 year averages are available from the U.S. National Arboretum (USNA).3
2. Micro-climatic zones—climates outside the normal zone affected by mountains, valleys, seacoasts, urban centers, structures, and surrounding buildings. Additionally, the amount and direction of sunlight, seasonal temperature, rainfall, wind, humidity, and soil type create unique rooftop micro-environments.

Structure-dependent factors
1. Composition and depth of growing medium.
2. Slope of roof.
3. Transmission of heat through steel, wood, HVAC vents, etc.
4. Areas of shade, partial shade, full sun, wind flow, building height, parapet walls.

Plant-dependent factors
1. Growth rate.
2. Sensitivity to airborne pollutants.
3. Ability to withstand wind.
4. Sensitivity to light.
5. Tolerance to drought.
6. Fire resistance.

Supply and scheduling
1. Availability of required plants.
2. Planting methods.
3. Timing of installation.

Once the plant selection is established, the green roof design process can begin.

Plants determine the growing medium depth
The growing medium depth necessary to sustain plant growth depends on the plant species and maintenance practices. Figure 2 is a rule-of-thumb guideline for general species and green roof type.4

The terms ‘extensive’ and ‘intensive’ green roofs were adopted from the German FFL Green Roof Guidelines. While there can be some variations in definition, the main distinction between the two types is the depth of the growing medium and the maintenance required to sustain the system.

Extensive green roof systems
Extensive green roofs use a narrower range of species limited to herbs, grasses, mosses, and drought-tolerant succulents such as Sedum, a plant known for its tolerance for extreme conditions. These types of plants can potentially be sustained without automatic irrigation in a growing medium layer as shallow as 25.4 mm (1 in.). Therefore, they can often be installed on buildings without the cost of major structural alterations.5 The fully saturated weight of an extensive green roof system ranges from 58.8 to 171.5 kg/m2 (12 to 35 lb/sf).6

Extensive green roofs are generally not accessible to the public and have lower input requirements for resources. They require less maintenance and are generally less expensive to install. Annual maintenance consists of a general inspection, removal of weeds and unwanted vegetation, and a nutrient check of the growing medium. If a grass-based system is used, it will require more frequent mowing and nutrient checking.

Intensive green roof systems
Intensive green roofs use a wide variety of plant species that may also include trees and shrubs. Using large plants requires deeper growing medium layers, usually 152 mm (6 in.) or more, which results in additional weight and a need for an increased structural load capacity of the building. The fully saturated weight of an intensive green roof system ranges from 245 to 1470 kg/m2 (50 to 300 lb/sf).7

Intensive green roofs are often accessible to the general public and can create a park-like atmosphere. Higher input requirements for water, labor, and other resources are standard. Regular care and upkeep is required, similar to that of an ornamental garden.8

Typical maintenance for this type of green roof includes:
· weeding and removal of unwanted vegetation;
· cutting and trimming;
· preventative measures to protect plants from pests and diseases;
· fertilization; and
· watering.

Structural substrate influences roof design
The weight of a green roof assembly will influence the decision on selecting a structural substrate. The most common structural substrates are metal decks and structural concrete decks. The substrate selection will directly impact the green roof assembly.

Metal deck and conventional green roof designs
Figure 3 (page XX) illustrates a typical green roof assembly over a metal deck. The most common design approach over a metal deck is to build a ‘conventional’ roof assembly. Typical components starting at the deck are:
· metal deck;
· thermal barrier (if required by code);
· rigid insulation;
· waterproofing membrane;
· drainage composite;
· growing medium; and
· vegetation.

The thermal barrier is rigid, fire-tested hardboard that is mechanically attached to the metal deck. It is moisture-resistant and available in 6-mm (0.25-in.), 13-mm (0.50-in.) and 16-mm (0.625-in.) thicknesses.

The rigid insulation material is typically extruded polystyrene (XPS), which is resistant to moisture absorption and has been used in green roof applications for decades. It is available in 280 kPa (40 psi), 420 kPa, (60 psi), and 700 kPa (100 psi) compressive strengths so it will not crush during construction or under load after placement. Local building codes usually require the installation of a thermal barrier over the metal deck prior to installing the XPS insulation board.

Rigid polyisocyanurate (polyiso) foam insulation is sometimes used in conventional green roof applications. The benefit is it does not require a thermal barrier. However, since polyiso foam is typically manufactured with a 140 to 175 kPa (20 to 25 psi) compressive strength, a rigid hardboard should be installed over the insulation to protect it from damage during the vegetated cover installation. Like XPS, polyiso is mechanically attached to the metal deck and the hardboard is glued to the isocyanurate with a cold-applied adhesive. Adhering the hardboard to the insulation is the preferred method since it eliminates fastener heads and plates under the waterproofing membrane.

The waterproofing membrane is installed over the insulation. It is usually loose-laid, but can be mechanically fastened or adhered if required. Some waterproofing membrane manufacturers require a separation layer (e.g. felt) between the insulation and membrane.

The most common type of waterproofing membrane in the conventional green roof design is a thermoplastic sheet, which is typically formulated from polyvinyl chloride (PVC). PVC sheets have a long track record in green roof applications in Europe and the United States. Both the Swiss and German governments closely regulate waterproofing membranes used in green roof construction. The Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA) 280 standard for concealed roofing (i.e. waterproofing membranes) and German FLL are regarded as the most stringent and meaningful green roof membrane test protocols in the world.9 This author recommends design professionals specify waterproofing membranes that meet both protocols to ensure product suitability. SIA- and FLL-certified membranes can provide an impermeable barrier against aggressive root growth and ponded water. The laps and flashings are hot-air welded, providing permanent seaming.

Other sheet waterproofing membrane options include thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) and ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM)10. TPO is a newcomer to green roof applications but since it is thermoplastic, it offers the security of hot-air welded seams. EPDM has been used in waterproofing applications such as plaza decks for years. These sheets are available in various thicknesses depending on the depth of the green roof and the length of the manufacturer’s warranty. These products may require a root barrier to protect the waterproofing membrane from root growth.

Built-up and modified bitumen roofing systems are used less frequently in green roof applications because of concerns among specifiers of the long-term performance of bitumen in such harsh, buried, living environments.

The drainage composite is placed over the waterproofing membrane. There are several types of drainage composites available. The drainage structures vary from entangled filaments to thermoformed dimpled cups to geonets. Some drainage composites also serve as the protection layer for the waterproofing membrane. A separate protection layer can be specified over the waterproofing membrane and under the drainage composite for added protection and security, especially on projects anticipating a significant amount of construction traffic.

Benefits of conventional roof designs
Conventional roof designs are most common in extensive green roof systems. Since these systems are relatively lightweight, steel decking is typically used as the substrate for the green roof. Although conventional roof designs are common for exposed and ballasted roofs, there are additional specific benefits when used in green roofs.

1. Insulation is protected and dry. Since the insulation is under the membrane, it is not subjected to rain, moisture, plant roots, microorganisms and the like found within the vegetated cover.
2. Insulation does not interfere with water retention systems. Some green roofs are designed to retain water to sustain the vegetated cover. The water is usually retained at the membrane level. If insulation is introduced above this barrier, it will interfere with the water retention system. Additionally, ponding ridges—when incorporated into the system—can be easily secured directly to the waterproofing membrane.
3. Insulation remains in place. If the insulation is placed above the waterproofing membrane, it may become buoyant and float during severe rain events, likely displacing the vegetated cover above.
4. Tapered insulation is an option. The designer has the flexibility to incorporate tapered insulation into the design since it is under the waterproofing membrane and creates slope to facilitate drainage.

Concrete deck and protected membrane design
Because of the heavy loads associated with intensive green roofs, the most common substrate is structural concrete with a ‘protected membrane’ roof assembly. Figure 4 illustrates a typical green roof assembly over a concrete deck. Typical components starting at the deck are:
· structural concrete deck;
· leveling layer (if required by membrane manufacturer);
· waterproofing membrane;
· protection/drainage layer (optional);
· XPS insulation;
· drainage composite;
· growing medium; and
· vegetation

In this design, the waterproofing membrane is installed over the concrete deck and insulation is placed above this barrier. The waterproofing membrane can be adhered or ‘compartmentalized’ in a containment grid configuration to localize water migration under the waterproofing membrane in the event of a leak.

The most common types of waterproofing membranes for the protected membrane assembly are thermoplastic sheets, self-adhering bituminous sheets, and hot liquid-applied rubberized asphalt. Thermoplastic sheets are versatile since they can be adhered directly to the concrete substrate or installed in a containment grid configuration. Self-adhering bituminous sheets and hot liquid-applied rubberized asphalt systems bond directly to the deck.

Adhered system
Adhered systems are most commonly used in new construction projects where a smooth concrete finish can be specified and achieved in the field. Most waterproofing membrane manufacturers require a magnesium float or steel trowel finish. The concrete should be cured for 14 to 28 days and be surface-dry for the membrane application. If used, curing compounds must be compatible with the waterproofing membrane and should not interfere with the bond of the membrane to the concrete substrate. Adhered systems typically have installation temperature limitations since adhesives tend to lose their tack in cold temperatures (i.e. approximately –4 to 4 C [25 to 40 F]), or may become too sticky to work with in high temperatures (i.e. approximately 32 C [90 F]).

Sheet systems can provide factory-controlled uniform thickness throughout the waterproofing membrane. The materials can be adhered with specially formulated, compatible field-applied adhesives. Some membrane manufacturers offer ‘self-adhered’ membranes that incorporate a pressure-sensitive adhesive that is factory-applied onto the waterproofing membrane during manufacture. The pressure-sensitive adhesive is protected by a release liner that is removed during the installation. The concrete substrate is conditioned or primed prior to the membrane installation to bind residual dust that can interfere with the membrane’s adhesion.

Hot liquid-applied rubberized asphalt systems have been used over concrete decks in green roof applications for a number of years. The rubberized asphalt material is shipped as a solid and is heated on-site in a double-jacketed melter between 176 to 190 C (350 to 375 F). It is applied in a two-coat liquid application with a reinforcing fabric placed between each coat. A surface conditioner is sprayed to the concrete deck prior to installing the rubberized asphalt and allowed to dry. The first coat of rubberized asphalt is a minimum 2.3-mm (90 mil) thick. A layer of spun bonded polyester fabric reinforcing sheet is embedded into the first coat, followed by a second layer with an average thickness of 3.2 mm (125 mil). The total membrane thickness is an average of 5.46 mm (215 mil) with a minimum thickness of 4.57 mm (180 mil).11

A root barrier protection course is embedded into the rubberized asphalt while the material is still hot. This layer is required to protect the waterproofing membrane from the aggressive roots of the vegetated cover. It also provides installers with a walking surface.

Containment grid system
The containment grid system is an option with thermoplastic sheets. It combines the performance benefits of the adhered system with the application benefits of a loose-laid system. In this design, the area to be waterproofed is segmented into smaller waterproofed grids. If there is a leak in the system, water cannot migrate from one grid to another, making it easier to locate the source of the leak.

Containment grids are created by bonding 305-mm (12-in.) wide thermoplastic grid strips to the concrete deck by bonding them with a specially formulated adhesive. The grid strips are installed around the deck’s perimeter, around projections, at the base of walls, and at the high points of the sloped areas. The waterproofing membrane is loose-laid over a geotextile fabric and welded to the grid strips. Since the waterproofing membrane is loose-laid between the grids, it can be installed at any temperature, even over damp surfaces. This provides a significant benefit to the construction schedule since it will limit the number of no-work days.

The grid system is frequently used on renovation projects where significant time and money may be spent preparing the entire concrete deck to receive an adhered system. Instead, surface preparation is limited to the areas receiving the grid strips. The geotextile fabric provides a cushioning layer and separates the existing waterproofing system from the new waterproofing membrane.

Insulation
Since the insulation is on top of the waterproofing membrane in a protected membrane roof assembly, XPS should be specified. It is designed for moist, buried environments. Polyiso insulation boards are only intended for ‘conventional’ roof designs.

Drainage and water retention
Prefabricated drainage composites or granular drainage systems are placed over the XPS insulation in protected membrane assemblies. This allows excess water to evacuate the system quickly. In some cases, an additional layer of drainage composite may be installed under the insulation to prevent floatation. As a rule of thumb, the additional layer of drainage is required if the thickness of the growing medium is less than 1.5 times the thickness of the XPS insulation.

Some green roofs are designed to retain as much water as possible to provide a water source for the vegetated cover. Since the waterproofing membrane is at the deck level, a secondary membrane (i.e. PVC thermoplastic sheet) is needed above the insulation to hold water. Water retention can also be achieved by installing specially designed panels that incorporate molded water retention cups and drainage channels.

Waterproofing quality assurance
Waterproofing is the most critical component of a green roof—a leak in the waterproofing system can be catastrophic. There are several options available to ensure a watertight system before the vegetated cover is planted. One option is to hire a monitor to observe the waterproofing and vegetated cover installation. The monitor should be trained in the membrane application and flashing details. A careful eye can detect application deficiencies and membrane breaches.

A flood test is the most common method for testing for watertightness after the waterproofing is installed and prior to the vegetated cover installation. The area is ‘flooded’ with 51 mm (2 in.) of water for 48 hours, after which an inspector checks the inside of the structure for signs of water leakage. If an area is wet, he or she looks for a breach in the waterproofing system, which can be a challenge to detect. Once the breach is found, it is repaired and the area is flood tested again.

Electric field vector mapping (EFVM) is a technique to detect breaches in the waterproofing membrane that are not easily observed by the human eye or are missed during flood tests. This technique is competitive in cost to traditional flood tests. Although it has been used for a number of years in Europe, it is now gaining acceptance in North America. EFVM has several benefits, including:

· locating membrane breaches with pin-point accuracy;
· providing the ability to re-test membrane repairs immediately;
· permanently installed EFVM components facilitate re-testing throughout the lifecycle of the membrane;
· can be used before and after vegetated cover is installed; and
· eliminating unnecessary and costly removal of the vegetated cover.12

It is important to specify compatible protection and/or drainage layers when using EFVM, since some types of protection layers and drainage panels may interfere with the test.

Conclusion
Green roofs are here to stay in North America. At the present time, there are no design standards. Designers are challenged to develop their own green roof designs and specifications with limited information and resources. Waterproofing manufacturers are becoming more involved in the design process to ensure proper selection and placement of green roof components.

In an effort to simplify the design and delivery process, some waterproofing manufacturers have partnered with vegetated cover providers to offer single-source warranties. Such partnerships leverage the expertise and experience of each to deliver technically sound, time-tested, cost-effective green roof solutions. Single-source responsibility drives the parties to become engaged early in the design phase through the installation and beyond. Coordination and cooperation of the waterproofing manufacturer and vegetated cover provider will ensure high-performance, long-lasting green roofs.

Notes
1 See “First Annual Green Roof Industry Survey Shows Significant Growth in North America”. The Green Roof Infrastructure Monitor, Volume 8, No. 1 (Fall 2006).
2 See Green Roofs for Healthy Cities. Green Roof Design 101 Introductory Course, Participant Manual. The Cardinal Group Inc. 2004:67-69.
3 For more on macro- and micro-climatic zones, see the U.S. National Arboretum (USDA) Plant Hardiness Zone Map at www.usna.usda.gov/Hardzone/hrdzon3.html.
4 See C.R. Friedrich’s “Principles for Selecting the Proper Components for a Green Roof Growing Media,” presented at the Third Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference in Washington, DC (May 2005).
5 See Green American Society for Testing Materials. Practice for Assessment of Green Roofs, WK575 Subcommittee E06.71 2002-2-7.
6 Green Roofs for Healthy Cities. Green Roof Infrastructure: Design and Installation – 201, Participant Manual. The Cardinal Group Inc. 2006: 4.
7 See note 6.
8 See note 5.
9 See P.J. D’Antonio’s “Thermoplastic Waterproofing Membranes in Green Roof Construction 2004”, RCI Interface, February 2004.
10 See A.P. Bailey’s “So you want to roof green?”, Professional Roofing, April 2006.
11 See Garden Roof Assembly, Long Form Specification. American Hydrotech, Inc. at www.hydrotechusa.com/specifications/GARDEN_RF Extensive Guidespec.doc. (February 2007).
12 See EFVM Benefits. International Leak Detection at www.leak-detection.com (February 2007).

Additional Information
MasterFormat No.

UniFormat No.

Key words

Abstract
Selecting and locating the various components of a green roof can be challenging. This article focuses on the various waterproofing design options as it relates to the type of green roof and structural deck selected for the project.

Author
Gary W. Whittemore, CDT, has been with Sika Sarnafil Inc. since 2000. He is the product manager for the U.S. waterproofing group based in Sika Sarnafil’s U.S. corporate headquarters in Canton, MA. Prior to this position, he was the national retail and strategic accounts manager for the commercial roofing group. Prior to joining Sika Sarnafil, Whittemore held various waterproofing sales and product management positions during a 20-year career at W. R. Grace & Co. Whittemore holds a B.A. from Columbia University in New York, NY. He can be contacted at whittemore.gary@us.sika.com.

A LEARNING EXPERIENCE

Harbert Roofing Inc. installs its first green roof system on Shasta County Library

by Krista Reisdorf

As published in NRCA's Professional Roofing magazine, April 2007. www.nrca.net

When the Shasta County Library in Redding, Calif., needed roof systems installed on its new building, the project was put out for public bid. The general contractor that was awarded the project determined which roofing contractor would install the roof systems on the building.
So Harbert Roofing Inc., Redding, was pleased the general contractor chosen was one with which Harbert Roofing has a close working relationship. As a result, Harbert Roofing was chosen to install the new roof systems on the Shasta County Library and given the opportunity to try something it never had done before—install a green roof system.

A choice
Harbert Roofing's relationship with Carlisle, Pa.-based Carlisle SynTec Inc. and experience with its products led Harbert Roofing to choose a Carlisle SynTec system for the project.

"We specified Carlisle SynTec 0.080-mil-thick Sure-Weld® TPO single-ply membrane roof system on the main library roof," says Howard Harbert Jr., vice president of Harbert Roofing.
The company also was asked to install 30 squares of Metal Sales Manufacturing Corp.'s Vertical Seam panels at the clerestory overlooking the garden, as well as Metal Sales Manufacturing Clip-Loc metal panels on the shed roof and at the library entrance. In addition, a 6,000-square-foot green roof system was requested for the lower section of the library, which can be seen from inside the building.

Photos courtesy of Harbert Roofing Inc., Redding, Calif.
Grasses installed over the membrane

Additionally, Harbert Roofing was asked to perform below-grade waterproofing and wall waterproofing, as well as supply and install reglet as needed.

Layers
The green roof system installation was complex, consisting of many layers.

"With help from Carlisle SynTec's technical department, we had basic training to become more familiar with green roof installation and began the installation by installing Carlisle SynTec Polyiso Insulation set in a layer of hot asphalt over a structural concrete deck and layer of 1/2-inch-thick DensDeck Prime," Harbert says. "Next, we laid Carlisle SynTec 0.080-mil-thick Sure-Weld TPO membrane and stripped in all field seams and wall seams with a 6-inch-wide membrane with a double welder and seam patched all T-joints. Fully adhered 0.080-mil-thick TPO provides greater puncture resistance and breaking strength.







Ornamental grasses were planted over the membrane.






"We then laid down a layer of CCW 300 Protection Fabric, which is used to resist soil chemicals, mildew and insects and is nonbiodegradable," he continues. "We installed Carlisle SynTec Sure-Seal HP Protective Mat, which is used as a slip sheet in this application, and then installed Carlisle SynTec Non-Reinforced Polypropylene Geomembrane. The geo­membrane is formulated for long-term use in buried applications."

The company then installed Carlisle SynTec's CCW MiraDrain Drainage Board, which has a polystyrene core with pierced holes, allowing water retention and drain-age. A Carlisle SynTec Moisture Retention Mat, which is designed to retain moisture in roof gardens, also was installed.
McEntire Landscaping, Redding, installed the roof system's irrigation system, growth media and plants.

For the main library's roof, Harbert Roofing installed a layer of Carlisle SynTec 4-inch-thick Sure-Seal polyisocya-nurate insulation, Carlisle Crickets and 1/2-inch-thick DensDeck Prime over a structural metal deck. The 0.080-mil-thick Sure-Weld TPO single-ply membrane then was mechanically fastened.

Ornamental grasses were planted over the membrane.

The company also installed a metal roof system over a structural metal deck at the clerestory overlooking the garden roof.

"We began this installation using RMAX nail base and a layer of Grace Construction Products Vycor® underlayment," Harbert says. "Next, we installed a layer of Fontana 30-pound felt and Metal Sales Manufacturing 18-inch Vertical Seam metal panels."

A metal roof was installed over the building's book drop, as well. Harbert Roofing applied peel-and-stick Metal Sales Manufacturing High-Temp underlayment and installed Metal Sales Manufacturing 16-inch Clip-Lok panels.

Waterproofing work also was performed during the installation.

"At the elevator pit, we used Grace Construction Products PrePrufe® 160R under the concrete," Harbert says. "After the concrete was poured, we used one layer of Grace Construction Products Bituthene® 4000 and Grace Construction Products Hydroduct® 220 protection board, which are peel-and-stick products.

"In addition, we installed Grace Construction Products peel-and-stick Perm-A-Barrier® Wall Membrane on top of all the parapet walls that received stucco and mechanically fastened about 3,000 linear feet of Fry STX reglet," he continues.

As a safety precaution, the company employed a standard 6-foot barrier around the roof using safety cones and rope to indicate the roof's edge.

A test
Harbert Roofing not only installed three roof systems but installed a roof system it never had installed before.

"This was our first green roof system installation," Harbert says. "We are not aware of any other green roofs in northern California-certainly not north of Sacramento. This installation was different from a typical single-ply roof system installation because of the extra layers of protection installed over the single-ply roof system. These layers protect the single-ply membrane from punctures that could occur when the landscaping company installs the growth media and other garden amenities, as well as offer protection for ongoing green roof maintenance."

Harbert Roofing's work was put to the test after the green roof system was installed.
"The specifications required that the green roof installation be certified by a third party to ensure there were no leaks before installing the protective layers of roofing products and growth media," Harbert says. "This testing was performed by International Leak Detection, Ontario. They use a method referred to as Electric Field Vector Mapping® (EFVM)."

An employee from International Leak Detection, Ontario, lays out the Electric Field Vector Mapping.

During this process, an electrical potential difference is set up between the membrane surface and structural deck. If there are leaks, the electrical current will help detect them by flowing to the source. An EFVM Potentiometer then is connected to two probes on the membrane surface to identify the direction of the electrical current and find the puncture or breach.

"At the conclusion of the EFVM test, we were told we passed with 100 percent, meaning there were no leaks detected," Harbert says. "International Leak Detection also told us we were one of only a few that ever has passed this test with 100 percent upon first inspection."

Working together
Coordination was helpful when the company was installing the roof systems.
"There were many consultants, architects, material suppliers and crew members involved during the project, and we had to make sure we were in tune with everyone," Harbert says. "A lot of time was spent coordinating submittals before we could order materials.

"We worked closely with Dick Gillenwater, manager of Advanced Proj­ects an­­d Green Roof Systems for Carlisle SynTec, through numerous e-mails and telephone calls to perfect our submittals and the green roof installation," he continues.

The experience was valuable for the roofing company.

"We are one of a few roofing contractors in Redding that performs single-ply roofing, and we want to stay on the leading edge of technology," Harbert says. "We thought this project would be a great learning experience and allow our company to gain more valuable experience."

Krista Reisdorf is managing editor of Professional Roofing magazine.


Project name: Shasta County Library
Project location: Redding, Calif.
Project duration: Feb. 21, 2006-Aug. 30, 2006
Roof system type: Green roof, single-ply and metal
Roofing contractor: Harbert Roofing Inc., Redding, Calif.
Roofing manufacturer: Carlisle SynTec Inc., Carlisle, Pa.; Metal Sales Manufacturing Corp., Woodland, Calif.; and Grace Construction Products, Cambridge, Mass.

FLOOD TESTING

CANADIAN ROOFING CONTRACTORS’ ASSOCIATION
ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES ENTREPRENEURS EN COUVERTURE
100-2430 Don Reid Drive · Ottawa, Ontario · K1H 1E1 · Tel: 800/461-2722 · 613/232-6724 · Fax: 613/232-2893
Website: www.roofingcanada.com · E-mail: crca@on.aibn.com

ADVISORY BULLETIN MARCH 2007

FLOOD TESTING

Upon completion of a roof installation, many owners wish to verify the integrity of construction prior to “taking possession”. Some designers and consultants specify that a flood test of the roof be carried out as a means of assuring that the roof has been properly built. The CRCA National Technical Committee does not support this practice, believing that flood testing is not a reliable quality assurance method and that the risks associated with flood testing far outweigh any potential benefits.

Flood testing will not provide useful information about the quality of the roof design or installation, nor about the durability of the materials used. It may, if the depth of water is sufficient, indicate whether there is a breach in the membrane, but it will not confirm the overall ability of the roof to provide satisfactory service throughout its expected service life. The ability to resist wind and impact loads, to remain dimensionally stable, to resist temperature induced stress and numerous other attributes are as important for the long term performance of the roof.

Flood testing can cause irreparable damage to the roofing system, or even the supporting structure. Water weighs 1000 kg/m3 (62.4 lb/ft³). If a flood test calls for a depth of 50 mm (2 in), it would add 50 kg/m2 (10 lb/ft²) to the dead load. However, most roofs, when properly constructed, are positively sloped to drains. CRCA together with many other industry organizations, recommend a minimum slope of 2%.

A simple example will demonstrate how this will significantly increase the load on the roof. Assume a roof is divided into basins of 15 m (50 ft) in length and width. Also assume that it is sloped at 2% to a drain in the centre of the basin. We know that the water, having a density of 1000 kg/m³ (62.4 lb/ft³), covering the roof with a uniform depth of 50 mm (2 in) weighs 50kg/m2 (10 lb/ft²). Over the entire area of the roof basin (225 m², or 2500 ft²) the standing water at a uniform depth of 50 mm (2in) would weigh 11250 kg (25,000 lb). The additional volume of water in the basin resulting from the slope is 1/3 (15 m x 15 m x 0.15 m) = 11.25 m3 (400 ft³) which weighs a total of 11,250 kg (25,000 lb), or 50 kg/m2 (10 lb/ft²) if divided uniformly over the roof. The total combined uniform weight of the water is, therefore, approximately 100 kg/m2 (20 lb/ft²). The capacity of roofs constructed to near their design load limits may be exceeded by this weight of the water.

Properly constructed low-slope roofs are positively drained and are not designed to withstand large hydrostatic pressure loads. Fifty millimetres of water over the roof will exert a static fluid pressure of ˜72.5 kPa (10.5 psi). The pressure increases to over 215 kPa (31.25 psi) when the depth increases to150 mm (6 in), as would occur over the drain sump as in the example of a sloped basin.

The opinions expressed herein are those of the CRCA National Technical Committee. This Advisory Bulletin is circulated for the purpose of bringing roofing information to the attention of the reader. The data, commentary, opinions and conclusions, if any, are not intended to provide the reader with conclusive technical advice and the reader should not act only on the roofing information contained in this Advisory Bulletin without seeking specific professional, engineering or architectural advice. Neither the CRCA nor any of its officers, directors, members or employees assumes any responsibility for any of the roofing information contained herein or the consequences of any interpretation which the reader may take from such information.

Although a membrane properly supported in the field of the roof should be able to resist these pressures, transitions and joints that rely on sealants, compression bars etc, may fail under such loads resulting in leakage. Should there be a weakness in the membrane, transitions, or edges of the roofing system, significant water ingression may occur, damaging the roof components, interior finishes and building contents. It should also be remembered that in the event of a leak occurring, it could not be stopped until all of the water is effectively drained from the roofs. By then the damage will have been done.

The safety of those individuals conducting the flood test must also be considered. A roof covered in water is difficult and hazardous to walk upon. When the drain plug is removed, the force of the draining water has sufficient force to suck a worker’s arm into the drain causing serious injury. In addition, the force of the whirlpooling water may damage drain and pipe connections.

Although flood testing is not recommended for roof applications, it may be a useful method for determining the integrity of waterproofing systems. Waterproofing systems are designed and constructed to resist substantial hydrostatic loads while in service. By example, the National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA) recommends a minimum of 5 plies of reinforcement in an asphalt built-up membrane where the anticipated hydrostatic pressure head that needs to be resisted is 7.9 to 15.2 m (26 to 50 ft). Due to the difficulty in uncovering a waterproofing membrane, it is prudent to conduct a flood test to verify that they will be leak free under such loads.

For roofing applications, however, where such pressures are not expected during service, flood testing will provide little useful information about the performance properties of the roof. There are many alternate non-destructive methods of evaluating the quality of the roof system that are far more reliable —Infrared Thermography, Electrical Capacitance (Impedance) Testing, Nuclear Moisture Testing and Electric Field Vector Mapping (EFVM). The National Technical Committee of CRCA believes, however, that the most effective means of ensuring the satisfactory performance of the roof is by hiring a reputable roofing contractor and on-site monitoring of the installation by a knowledgeable roof observer.

Note: Much of the information contained in this Advisory Bulletin is taken from an article by J.P. Crowe, titled Water, Water Everywhere that appeared in the February 2006 issue of Professional Roofing. Information on how to acquire a copy of the entire article can be obtained at www.professionalroofing.net.

EFVM - A NEW LEAK DETECTION TECHNIQUE

by Chris Eichhorn, International Leak Detection & Charlie Miller, Roofscapes Inc.

Electric field vector mapping (EFVM*), a new and powerful tool for improving quality control of waterproofing systems, is now available. Although this method is unfamiliar
to most Americans, it has already achieved a long record of success in Europe.

Unlike most other leak detection methods, it can quickly and accurately locate the point
of water entry. Another unique aspect of this technique is that a pinhole (too small to find visually) is as easy to locate as a large tear or failed seam. Alternative approaches, such
as infrared surveys, can determine where water has accumulated in the insulation, but may
not be as useful in actually finding the waterproofing defect.

The EFVM* technique uses water as the electrically conductive medium. The survey technician installs a wire loop around the perimeter of the area to be tested and introduces an electrical potential. The area within the loop is dampened to form an upper electrical ‘plate’. The structural deck is the lower electrical plate, while the membrane separating the two plates acts as the insulator. If moisture enters a defect in the membrane, an electrical contact is established between the two plates (i.e., an electrical ground). The survey technician can then follow the direction of the electric field to the membrane defect. (Special procedures are required when using EFVM on projects with supplementary root barriers. The root-barrier membrane will act like an insulating layer. Therefore, it is necessary to make small incisions in the root-barrier to establish electrical contact with the underlying waterproofing membrane. These incisions can be re-sealed after the leak is located.)

The technique was pioneered in Germany by AB Flachdach Mess und Trocknungstechnik GmbH (AB Flachdach) in Germany. It is now available through their North American partner, International Leak Detection, Ltd. in Ontario, and through Roofscapes, Inc., a nation-wide green roof provider based in Philadelphia.

The benefits of EFVM* can be summarized as follows:
· Locates defects precisely, enabling efficient repairs
· Able to re-test repairs immediately
· Can be used AFTER cover systems are installed, especially with ‘green roof’ landscapes
· Less expensive than conventional flood testing
· Eliminates the hazard of overloading structural decks during testing, since ponding water
· is NOT part of the testing procedure
· Can be used on steeply sloping roof surfaces where flood testing is impossible

EFVM* has been used successfully with a wide range of waterproofing materials in Germany.
AB Flachdach has electronically surveyed 35 million square feet of roof membrane in the
past five years. However, an even broader range of waterproofing materials is in use in North America. The suitability of EFVM* depends on the electrical resistance of the water-proofing materials. In particular, EPDM membranes vary in their electrical properties, and some formulations containing carbon black may not be compatible. Aluminized protective coatings, commonly used in the US in conjunction with modified bituminous membranes, may also defeat the technique.

International Leak Detection Ltd. can conduct bench-scale tests in order to establish that EFVM* is suitable for a particular waterproofing material. EFVM* can also be used on all types of roof decks, including steel, concrete, and wood. (A special ‘grounding grid’ must be introduced in this case.)

The EFVM* method has proven highly advantageous in situations where the water-proofing is concealed or buried. These include IRMA (Inverted Roof Membrane Assembly) configurations, plaza installations, ballasted roofs, and ‘green roofs.’ Green roofs are veneer landscapes installed on top of conventional roofs. They may be anywhere from 2.5 inches to 3 feet deep. Without an effective method of locating defects, leak location and repair could become very expensive on these systems. For this reason, Roofscapes, Inc. offers the EFVM* technique as a standard option in its green roof installations. Currently, EFVM* is being used on numerous Roofscapes projects, including Point Defiance Zoo in Washington State, and a large chiropractic center in Pennsylvania.

A recent project in Frankfurt, Germany, illustrates the value of EFVM* as a loss prevention technique. This project involved an 110,000-square foot roof that was installed in 2000. The technicians found 17 defects in the membrane. Some of these flaws were located in defective seams (workmanship) but others were tiny punctures. There was no visible water damage in the interior of the building. The building owners did not know that there were any problems and probably would not have found the flaws until the insulation had become saturated.

For more information please contact:
Chris Eichhorn at International Leak Detection Ltd. (chris@leak-detection.com); or
Charlie Miller at Roofscapes, Inc. (cmiller@roofmeadow.com).

Welcome to our Blog

Thank you for visiting our new website. We hope you have found the information to be helpful. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to post on our blog or fill out the contact form on the main pages.

We look forward to hearing from you.